Who is public relations?
in charge of
in charge by
in charge in
in charge to
You have a(an) ; the examination has been postponed for two weeks.
excuse
chance
reprieve
absence
Since his clothes were wet, his story of being caught in the rain is .
absurd
predictable
plausible
sensible
Trespassing on private property is by law in most countries.
understandable
acceptable
forbidden
allowed
The level of implied by the warranty was confusing
protect
protective
protection
John’s face was when he heard of the less of the goods.
vivid
angry
somber
animated
To tremble in the face of a storm is to .
cower
shower
tower
glower
Your teacher looks at you if you admit to not wanting to study.
respectfully
askance
directly
only
To be was her lot, she was destined never to have earned enough money to
support herself.
imperfect
unbalanced
impecunious
important
A miracle is .
a natural occurrence
an unhappy occurrence
an unusual occurrence
a sad occurrence
When something is punctual it is .
early
late
on time
delayed
A bicycle is moved along by .
petrol
paddling
gravity
sunlight
Thanks to the state , the music center is now the showpiece of our university.
clearance
conventions
developments
subsidies
Although Mary is reputed to be aloof, her manner that day was so that
people felt relaxed.
reluctant
arrogant
mean
gracious
Her remarks were too to be taken seriously.
urbane
critical
careless
insipid
Worshipping her every move, Tom was her most admirer.
beneficent
ardent
sophisticated
urbane
It is hard to tell if these shoes will be because the leather is so stiff.
comfort
comfortably
comfortable
comforting
I like to the issue with you, but I am busy.
exploratory
exploration
exploring
explore
We adhere to our company’s policy in not accepting credit card.
strictness
strictly
strict
strictest
The synonym of “survive” is .
erode
elude
withstand
weaken
The synonym of “exaggerate” is .
dominate
impress
elaborate
embellish
The synonym of “inconsistent” is .
erratic
destructive
emphatic
commonplace
A good trial lawyer will argue only what is central to an issue, eliminating
information or anything else that might the client.
seminal—amuse
extraneous—jeopardize
erratic—enhance
responsible—initiate
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
By “one nature wrote the same reads” Emerson means that .
the author is rereading his own work
nature writing is read by the same people
author and reader live in the same era
author and reader are in accord
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The word “abstraction” is used to mean .
conception
notion
preoccupation
elimination
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
Emerson uses the image of insects to parallel his discussion of .
past writers storing knowledge for future readers
the food chain
the act of creative art
authors working in difficult situations
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
A good title of this essay might be .
Creative Writing
The Wealth of the Indian Nations
Creative Reading
Rating Good Books
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The proverb “He that would bring home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the
wealth of the Indies” is used to support his theory that .
one must apply knowledge to extract knowledge
only a writer can be a good reader
the wealth of the present is in the past
clever man is a good writer
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The word “braced” is used to mean .
upset
beamed
paired
bolstered
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The “manifold allusion” Emerson means .
diverse references
numerous mentions
fantasies
many sided remarks
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The word “oracle” means .
wonder
seer
reader
writer
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
The word “office” is used to mean .
place of study
work
department
duty
Ralph Waldo Emerson is one of America’s best known essayists. In 1837 he was called
on to give the Phi Beta Kappa address to Harvard. He spoke on “The America Scholar.”
It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They
impress us with the conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the
verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with the most
modern joy, with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all
time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this
poet, who lived in some past world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies,
close to my own soul, that which I also had well night thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we
should suppose some pre established harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be and
some preparation of stores for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay
up food before death for the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to
underrate the Book. We all known, that as the human body can be nourished on any food,
though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by any
knowledge. And the great and heroic men have existed who had almost no other
information than by the printed page. I would only say that it needs a strong head to bear
that diet. One must be an inventor to read well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring
home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then
creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion.
Every sentence is doubly significant and the sense of our author is as broad as the world.
We then see, what is always true, that as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among
heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least part, only the authentic
utterance of the oracle, all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and
Shakespeare’s.
Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and
exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their
indispensable office, to teach elements. But they can only highly serve us when they aim
not to drill, but to create, when they gather from far every ray of various genius to their
hospitable halls and by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame.
Emerson calls for an education system that .
includes works of the masters
teaches students how to do research
teaches students how to be practical
teaches students how to be wealthy
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
The writer has a bias towards classical music
True
False
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Folk music is elaborate.
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Folk music requires a lot of sill.
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Church music is .
devotional
entertaining
profitable
exciting
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Classical music’s origin is a blend of different kinds of music.
True
False
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
The music of the church is to entertain the audience.
True
False
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Folk music is generally the music of the educated class.
True
False
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Classical music is developed from dance music.
True
False
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
Classical music is known for its .
forte
softness
beauty
popularity
Classical music is another term for elaborately composed concert music. However, the
music is often referred to as “classical” because it is “old” music.
This old music developed from three sources. One source was the music of the church,
which used elaborate melodies and performance styles, more to praise God than to entertain
audiences.
The other two musical sources were in many ways completely opposed, not only to
church music, but to the influences of the church music and its teachings. This music was
folk music and popular dance music, both of which were frowned upon and even censured
by the church.
Folk music used simple vocal styles and repetitive musical forms such as common
among the untutored population. Its common, typically hand held instruments were used in
highly restricted but effective ways.
Despite official sanctions, both kinds of music flourished and their blend produced
concert music, which shared, in many ways, the simple appeal of folk music and the more
elaborate forms of church music.
The word “sanctions” means .
getting the blessing of the Church
getting the permission from the composers
getting the copyrights from the publishers
getting the reviews from the critics
可觀看題目詳解,並提供模擬測驗!(免費會員無法觀看研究所試題解答)